Task fulfillment
Does the answer directly address the prompt, cover the required points, and stay relevant to the situation?
Loading...
AI feedback for better practice
CELPTips works like a CELPIP training platform: you practise with realistic tasks, get instant feedback, see what held the answer back, and know exactly what to improve next. That rhythm helps learners stop guessing and train with more focus.
Does the answer directly address the prompt, cover the required points, and stay relevant to the situation?
Is the response easy to follow, with a clear opening, developed ideas, transitions, and a natural ending?
Does the speaker use precise, varied, and topic-appropriate language instead of repeating simple words?
Are sentence forms accurate enough to communicate clearly, including tense, agreement, articles, and complex structures?
Does the answer sound smooth, complete, and confident within the time limit, with few long pauses or restarts?
Does the response answer every bullet or survey requirement with enough detail and a clear position?
Are paragraphs organized logically, with topic sentences, support, examples, and a controlled conclusion?
Does the writing match the situation, such as polite formal email language or balanced survey-response language?
Are grammar, punctuation, sentence boundaries, spelling, and word forms controlled enough for clear communication?
Does the response use specific vocabulary and explain ideas instead of relying on vague or repetitive statements?
These examples use the same general idea. The level changes because the answer gives different evidence of development, precision, organization, and control.
CLB 6 example
I think the city should build more bike lanes because it is good for people. Bikes are healthy and not expensive. Some people may not like it because roads are busy, but I think it is still a good idea.
Why this score: The main idea is clear, but support is general, vocabulary is simple, and the explanation needs more development.
CLB 8 example
I would support adding more bike lanes, especially near schools and transit stations. It could reduce short car trips and make commuting cheaper. However, the city should protect parking in business areas so local shops are not affected too much.
Why this score: The answer gives a clear opinion, relevant reasons, a concession, and better vocabulary. Some ideas could still be expanded.
CLB 10 example
I would support a targeted bike-lane expansion rather than a city-wide redesign. Protected lanes near schools, train stations, and dense neighbourhoods would improve safety and reduce congestion without disrupting every commercial street. The city could also phase the project in and measure usage before expanding it further.
Why this score: The answer is specific, well organized, nuanced, and uses controlled grammar with stronger vocabulary and a practical recommendation.
The score explanation should connect the result to observable parts of the response. That means the feedback points to what is present, what is missing, and what change would most improve the next attempt.
Next step
Join the CELPIP Speaking Marathon to practise with fresh topics, useful vocabulary, sample answer structure, and repeatable daily tasks. This is where feedback becomes a habit: answer, review, improve, repeat.